"AI is going to change everything," Chandra said, emphasizing its potential to revolutionize content creation. However, he also stressed the continued importance of human journalists.
"Trust and verification are critical aspects where human expertise reigns supreme. I would not trust AI right now or ever when it comes to curation,” he explained.
He went on to explain this with an example.
“I think AI can do a better job in writing and creating shorter pieces of content, which is just information. For instance, determining the winner of a hockey match, the corresponding score, or the current state of the stock market - AI can handle these tasks with speed and precision, avoiding spelling or grammatical errors. It can produce a complete story, including headlines, effortlessly,” he said.
“But when it comes to complex narratives or opinion-based pieces, such as analyzing the Vinesh Phogat case, human judgment remains essential. AI can assist in research, but the final analysis and storytelling should be done by a human," he added.
According to Chandra, while AI can efficiently process information, humans are better equipped to understand context, biases, and the nuances of storytelling.
The session also addressed the inevitable impact of AI on the workforce. Chandra acknowledged the potential job losses in journalism but emphasized the opportunity for humans to focus on higher-level tasks like analysis and interpretation.
"I think it is very possible that it could lead to net job loss," he said, adding that "humans will continue to do better than AI in certain things."
Looking ahead, Chandra anticipates significant changes in news consumption and distribution.
The session concluded with a call for increased awareness and understanding of AI's impact on society. Chandra urged individuals to engage in discussions about AI and its implications for the future.
